A Statistical Analysis of Traffic Flow Characteristics of Multilane Highways in Baghdad City, Part B: Traffic Noise Levels
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
Road traffic noise is a function of basic traffic element (flow, speed, density) and percentage of heavy vehicles. The recognition of traffic noise as a one of the main sources of environmental pollution has led to the development of statistical models that enable the prediction of traffic noise level from fundamental variables of basic traffic element. The main objective of this research is finding out the effects of these elements on traffic noise levels for multilane highways in Baghdad city. Data has been collected throughout an extensive field survey on twenty selected sections in the study area. Noise levels were measured by using sound level meter in five stations in each selected road and the noise level reading was taken at each ten seconds, the reading of sound level meter was recorded directly, then the noise levels were determined ( L10, L50, L90, Leq). Statistical technique is applied to analyze the collected data by the aids of computer program packages in order to present the best model to describe the influence of flow, speed , density and percentage of trucks on traffic noise levels. The results of this study indicate that the second and third order equations are the best models that represent the effect of each traffic element on each traffic noise level in general, and especially on L16 noise level.
المقاييس
تفاصيل المقالة

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
##plugins.generic.plaudit.displayName##
المراجع
Al-Ramahai, A. N. (2005), A Statistical Analysis of Traffic Elements Characteristics and Traffic Noise Relationships of Multilane Highways in Baghdad City”, M.Sc. Thesis, College of Engineering, University of Tikrit.
Federal Highway Administration (1980), “Highway Traffic Noise”, U.S. Department, Environment, USA.
Brown,A.L., (1989), “Some Transformations for Road Traffic Noise Scales”, Australian Road Research, Technical Note, No.1, Vol. 19
Jong-San Tsat, Jen-Jon Lorv and Yi-Sheng Lin, ( 2003), “The Study of Matircnratical Model for Predicting Road Trafilc Noise “, Tarmkang Joirnral of Since and Engineering, Vol.6, No.2, Japan.
Salter, R J (1985), “Highway Traffic Analysis and Design”, 2nd Edition, Macmillan Education, LTD., Basingstoke, London.
Federal Highway Administration, (2000), ” Highway Traffic Noise in the United States Problem and Response”, U.S. Department, Environment, USA.
Bary, T.M., Reagan, J.A. ( 1978) , “FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model”, Research Report FHWA-RD-77-108, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Hendricks, C.R.A., (2002), “Distance Limits for Traffic Noise Prediction Model”, Technical Advisory Noise TAN-02-02,California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California, U. S . A.
Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, (2003),”Noise Measurement procedures Manual Environment projection policy”, (Noise) Report No.7l.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc1,, (1999), “A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota”, Lafayette Road, saint Panel, Minnesota.
Technology Noise Supplement, (1998), ” A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol”, California Department of Transportation, Environmental Engineering, ll. S.A.
Abbott , P.G. ,Harris, G.J. ,(1999) , “The calculation of Road Traffic Noise Implications of Changing to LAeq Institute of Acoustics Autumn Conference, Noise and Vibration Group”, TRL., U.K.
International Standard Organization, ISO, (1997), “Acoustic Measurements of Road Surface on Traffic Noise”, Report No.1191, Noise and Vibration.
U.S. Department of Transportation’ (1995), “Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance “, Federal highway Administration, Noise and Air Quality Branch’ Washington ‘ D’C’
U.S. Environmental protection Agency (1974),”Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisites of Protect Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety “, Washington’ D’C’