Experimental Study for the Behavior of Anchored Sheet Pile Subjected to Cyclic Load in Sandy Soil
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
Excavation deeper than about six meters is restricted by the application of sheet pile walls with anchors. This paper examined the effects of different parameters on anchored sheet pile walls under a lateral cyclic load ratio (CLR) of 10% and several cycles equal to 100. It was fixed by two anchored piles horizontally and embedded in sandy soil. The ratio of the spacing between anchored to the free head of sheet pile wall (S/H= 1/3, 2/3, and 1) and the ratio of anchored length to the free head of sheet pile wall (L/H= 1, 4/3, and 5/3) under the influence of two–way cyclic lateral load at 0.2 Hz environmental frequency. The research aims to ascertain the rod's impact spacing and length anchored on the lateral and vertical displacement of the sheet pile, as well as the vertical displacement of surcharge (line load) applied to the surface. The wale for sheet pile decreased the lateral displacement of a sheet pile to 66% compared to lateral displacement without wale. Also, the results of the length rod to the free height of the sheet pile wall (L/H= 1) increased the anchored sheet pile wall's lateral displacement by about 55% from the cantilever sheet pile wall's lateral displacement with wale because it was near the active failure zone. The ratio of length to free head of sheet pile wall (L/H= 5/3) reduced the anchor sheet pile's lateral displacement wale by about 51% compared to the cantilever sheet pile's lateral displacement with wale. The ratio of length anchored to the free head of the sheet pile wall (L/H= 4/3) decreased the anchored sheet pile's lateral displacement to 49% compared to the cantilever sheet pile's lateral displacement with wale. Both reductions for two lengths with the spacing ratio between the anchors rod to the free head of the sheet pile wall was (S/H= 1/3).
المقاييس
تفاصيل المقالة

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
##plugins.generic.plaudit.displayName##
المراجع
Sivakumar BGL, Munwar BB. Optimum Design of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls in Sandy Soils Using Inverse Reliability Approach. Computers and Geotechnics 2008; 35(2):134-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.04.001
Eskandari L, Kalantari B. Basic Types of Sheet Pile Walls and their Application in the Construction Industry - A Review. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering EJGE. 2011; 16(1): 1533-1541.
Singh AP, Chatterjee K. Ground Settlement and Deflection Response of Cantilever Sheet Pile Wall Subjected to Surcharge Loading. Indian Geotechnical Journal 2020; 50:540-549.
King GJW. Analysis of Cantilever Sheet-Pile Walls in Cohesionless Soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE 1995; 121(9):629-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:9(629)
Madabhushi SPG, Chandrasekaran VS. Rotation of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE 2005; 131(2):202-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(202)
Bowles JE. Foundation Analysis and Design. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, New York; 2012.
Conti R, Viggiani GM. A New Limit Equilibrium Method for the Pseudostatic Design of Embedded Cantilevered Retaining Walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2013; 50:143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.03.008
Callisto L. Capacity Design of Embedded Retaining Structures. Géotechnique 2014; 64(3):204-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.091
Conti R, Viggiani GMB, Burali DF. Some Remarks on the Seismic Behavior of Embedded Cantilevered Retaining Walls. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2015; 64(1):40-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.031
Singh AP, Chatterjee K. Ground Settlement and Deflection Response of Cantilever Sheet Pile Wall Subjected to Surcharge Loading. Indian Geotechnical Journal 2019; 19:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00387-1
Motta E. Generalized Coulomb Active-Earth Pressure for Distance Surcharge. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE 1994; 120(6): 1072-1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(1072)
Georgiadis M, Anagnostopoulos C. Lateral Pressure on Sheet Pile Walls Due to Strip Load. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1998; 124(1):95-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:1(95)
Samadhiya NK. Evaluation of Model Sheet Pile Wall Adjacent to a Strip Footing - An Experimental Investigation. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2020; 14(7): 828-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1581459
Abd-Alameer HK, Abbas HO. The Behavior of Braced Excavation in Silty Clay Soil under El-Centro Seismic. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2023; 30(4):37-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.4.5
Ahmed AH, Abbas HO, Ibrahim AS. Cyclic Loading Effect on Batter Anchored Pile Group in Dry Sand. Geotechnical Geological Engineering 2023; 41:2787-2796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02426-4
Ahmed AH, Abbas HO, Ibrahim AS. Lateral Resistance of Inclined Pile Group in Sandy Soil. AIP Conference Proceedings 2023; 2806(1): 040005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163150