Shear Capacity- Rotational Relationship of the Normal Reinforced Concrete Beams
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the shear-rotation relationship of concrete beams under static loading. Nine cantilever beams with section dimensions of (200×300) mm and an effective depth of 266 mm were tested until failure. The study focuses on the effects of varying shear span-to-effective depth ratios (a/d) and spacing between stirrups on the beam’s behavior. The (a/d) ratio varied from 2.44 to 4.511, and the shear reinforcement spacing was (75, 100, and 150) mm. The key results included three modes of failure: shear, combined, and flexural failures. The shear failure occurred at an (a/d) ratio of 2.443, combined failure occurred at an a/d ratio of 3 and 3.571, and flexural failure occurred at an a/d ratio of 3.57 and 4.511. The ultimate load capacity of the beams decreased from 11.43% to 35.28% as the a/d ratio increased from 2.443 to 4.51. Curvature ductility increased significantly with high a/d ratios, rising to 174.95% as the (a/d) ratio increased from 2.44 to 3. Also, curvature ductility increased by 183.65% as the (a/d) ratio increased from 2.443 to 4.511. However, it decreased up to 25.98% with larger stirrup spacing, i.e., 150 mm. The shear-rotation demonstrated a significant increase with increasing (a/d) ratio from 2.443 to 3.571, i.e., 92%. However, this increase was accompanied by an increase in the rotation by 81.42% as (a/d) changed from 2.443 to 3.571, and increased to 84.84% as (a/d) changed from 2.443 to 4.511. The shear-plastic rotation relationship indicated that increasing the (a/d) ratio significantly improved ductility and the beam's ability to absorb energy. Increasing the spacing between stirrups adversely affected these properties, leading to reduced ductility, curvature, and load resistance.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Plaudit
References
Shu Z, Li Z, Yu X, Zhang J, He M. Rotational Performance of Glulam Bolted Joints: Experimental Investigation and Analytical Approach. Construction and Building Materials 2019; 213: 675–695.
Cladera A, Marí AR. Shear Design Procedure for Reinforced Normal and High-Strength Concrete Beams Using Artificial Neural Networks. Part I: Beams Without Stirrups. Engineering Structures 2004; 26(7): 917–926.
Case J, Chilver AH. Strength of Materials: An Introduction to the Analysis of Stress and Strain. Elsevier; 2013.
Zhao DB, Yi WJ, Kunnath SK. Shear Mechanisms in Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Impact Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 2017; 143(9): 04017089.
Gomes TA, de Resende TL, Cardoso DCT. Shear-Transfer Mechanisms in Reinforced Concrete Beams with GFRP Bars and Basalt Fibers. Engineering Structures 2023; 289: 116299.
Lopes SM, do Carmo RN. Deformable Strut and Tie Model for the Calculation of the Plastic Rotation Capacity. Computers & Structures 2006; 84(31-32): 2174–2183.
Vaz Rodrigues R, Muttoni A, Fernández Ruiz M. Influence of Shear on Rotation Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members Without Shear Reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal 2010; 107(5): 516–525.
Muttoni A, Fernández Ruiz M. Shear Strength of Members Without Transverse Reinforcement as Function of Critical Shear Crack Width. ACI Structural Journal 2008; 105(2): 163–172.
López AM, Sosa PFM, Senach JLB, Prada MÁF. Influence of the Plastic Hinge Rotations on Shear Strength in Continuous Reinforced Concrete Beams with Shear Reinforcement. Engineering Structures 2020; 207: 110242.
Li W, Leung CK. Effect of Shear Span-Depth Ratio on Mechanical Performance of RC Beams Strengthened in Shear with U-Wrapping FRP Strips. Composite Structures 2017; 177: 141–157.
Lubell AS, Bentz EC, Collins MP. Influence of Longitudinal Reinforcement on One-Way Shear in Slabs and Wide Beams. Journal of Structural Engineering 2009; 135(1): 78–87.
Somboonsong W, Ko FK, Harris HG. Ductile Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Plastic Reinforcing Bar for Concrete Structures: Design Methodology. ACI Materials Journal 1998; 95(6): 655–666.
Do Carmo RNF, Lopes SM. Influence of the Shear Force and Transverse Reinforcement Ratio on Plastic Rotation Capacity. Structural Concrete 2005; 6(3): 107–117.
Olalusi OB. Reliability Assessment of Shear Design Provisions for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Stirrups. Doctoral Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch; 2018.
ASTM A. A615 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; 2016.
ASTM International. ASTM C39M-14a: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International; 2014.
ASTM C. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; 2004.
ASTM C496/C496M-02. Standard Test Method of Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International; 2002.
Carpinteri A, Carmona JR, Ventura G. Failure Mode Transitions in Reinforced Concrete Beams--Part 2: Experimental Tests. ACI Structural Journal 2001; 108(3): 154–162.
Zakaria M, Ueda T, Wu Z, Meng L. Experimental Investigation on Shear Cracking Behavior in Reinforced Concrete Beams with Shear Reinforcement. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 2009; 7(1): 79–96.
ACI-ASCE Committee 426. Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members. ASCE Proceedings 1973; 99(ST6): 1091–1188.
Hassan HM, Ueda T, Tamai S, Okamura H. Fatigue Test of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Various Types of Shear Reinforcement. Transaction of JCI 1985; 7: 277–284.
Park R. Ductility Evaluation from Laboratory and Analytical Testing. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 1988; Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan; 8: 605–616.
Paulay T, Priestley MN. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1992.
Foroughi S, Yuksel SB. A New Approach for Determining the Curvature Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering 2022; 30(1): 8–20.
Do Carmo RN, Lopes SM. Ductility and Linear Analysis with Moment Redistribution in Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2005; 32(1): 194–203.
Mansor AA, Mohammed AS, Salman WD. Effect of Longitudinal Steel Reinforcement Ratio on Deflection and Ductility in Reinforced Concrete Beams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2020; 888(1): 012008.
FEMA. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. FEMA-440, Redwood City; 2005.
Saatcioglu M, Baingo D. Circular High-Strength Concrete Columns Under Simulated Seismic Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 1999; 125(3): 272–280.
Al-Salim NH, Jaber MH, Hassan RF, Mohammed NS, Hussein HH. Experimental Investigation of Compound Effect of Flexural and Torsion on Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams. Buildings 2023; 13(5): 1347.
López AM, Sosa PFM, Senach JLB, Prada MÁF. Influence of the Plastic Hinge Rotations on Shear Strength in Continuous Reinforced Concrete Beams with Shear Reinforcement. Engineering Structures 2020; 207: 110242.
Gusella F. Effect of the Plastic Rotation Randomness on the Moment Redistribution in Reinforced Concrete Structures. Engineering Structures 2022; 252: 113652.
Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R. Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 1988; 114(8): 1804–1826.